Re:A new abnormal: It is still 2 minutes to midnight
by TheOtherHobbes on Sunday October 13, 2019 @10:18AM
(#21240470)
How would you suggest they communicate their point?
Re:A new abnormal: It is still 2 minutes to midnight
by dooglius on Sunday October 13, 2019 @10:25AM
(#21240507)
As an explicitly partisan organization
Re:A new abnormal: It is still 2 minutes to midnight
by ben_w on Sunday October 13, 2019 @01:20PM
(#21241505)
How is “I don’t want civilization to end” partisan?
Re:A new abnormal: It is still 2 minutes to midnight
by fennecfoxen on Sunday October 13, 2019 @12:25PM
(#21241227)
I would suggest that they ought to have focused more on the threat of global thermonuclear annihilation and less on climate change. There is no shortage of focus on climate change these days, and the metaphor of the doomsday clock was much a more powerful and literal one when focusing on such weapons (the idea of a clock at five minutes to midnight being: the clock could start up again at any moment, and in five minutes, you would be dead).
Folding "climate change" into that makes only slightly more sense than augmenting a tornado warning system with information on the skyrocketing national debt. Mushy metaphors do little to change the world.
Perhaps the clock's maintainers sought to fend off irrelevance; no one pays attention to nuclear weapons as a threat in the West (barring occasional North Korea flare-ups). If that is the case, however, I fear that this has only made things worse.
The situation is grave, but the Doomsday Clock is a joke.