Re:California adopts nation's broadest gun seizure laws
by masonic on Sunday October 13, 2019 @09:13PM
(#21244509)
Instead of arguing should everyone have unrestricted access
Re:California adopts nation's broadest gun seizure laws
by seniorivn on Monday October 14, 2019 @07:39AM
(#21247185)
I think there are people who argue for that, but regardless, media and supporters of gun confiscation(meaning radical position on that side) certainly portrays everyone who think that current regulation is enough as unrestricted access supporters. Which makes it look like restricted/unrestricted conversation, when in fact it's not or shouldn't be.
I think society is too focused on instruments invented for violence and defense instead of violence(and defense) itself.
And yet my original statement is still accurate, as i said there is a consensus that dangerous things should be somewhat limited in use by 'dangerous' people. Like cars are.
Regarding guns. Instead of arguing should everyone have unrestricted access or not(like media is portraying it) people should talk about solutions that wouldn't involve government, because it's the only compromise those two camps can find(pro and anti gun).
P.S. most 'mass shootings' in us(in terms of media, when a few people got shot by single shooter or something like that) happened with illegal guns, which means instead of trying to create more regulation, people should figure out why current regulation doesn't work. And if there is no clear reason. Try other methods.