News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:A uBlock Origin update was rejected from the Chrome Web S... by behringer on Saturday October 12, 2019 @11:01AM (#21233667)
I don't know why people choose their browser based on resource usage. You can have a browser run by a company looking to loot the public good for their own gain, or a non-profit looking to keep the web open and free.

Hold on I'm going to pick the one that's marginally faster and more ram efficient...

Re:A uBlock Origin update was rejected from the Chrome Web S... by CharlesW on Saturday October 12, 2019 @11:11AM (#21233744)
> Hold on I'm going to pick the one that's marginally faster and more ram efficient...

In both cases, people are choosing products because they're better. "Better" for most favors properties of the product. "Better" for you favors the politics of the product. Both are completely valid approaches.

Re:A uBlock Origin update was rejected from the Chrome Web S... by okcando on Saturday October 12, 2019 @11:57AM (#21234114)
Eeeehhh... He's arguing for principles and I'm not comfortable with the claim that not having principles is every bit as valid as having them.
Re:A uBlock Origin update was rejected from the Chrome Web S... by Godel_unicode on Saturday October 12, 2019 @12:33PM (#21234372)
It's a pretty big leap from someone not sharing your exact principles to them not having principles at all.
Re:A uBlock Origin update was rejected from the Chrome Web S... by okcando on Saturday October 12, 2019 @12:38PM (#21234420)
I'd say that's a pretty uncharitable reading of my comment! That wasn't intended, to be clear.
Re:A uBlock Origin update was rejected from the Chrome Web S... by visarga on Saturday October 12, 2019 @12:24PM (#21234300)
> Hold on I'm going to pick the one that's marginally faster and more ram efficient...

It's about immediate pain vs future gain. People are susceptible to temporal discounting.

Re:A uBlock Origin update was rejected from the Chrome Web S... by switch007 on Saturday October 12, 2019 @11:11AM (#21233745)
Exactly. Come on, we're engineers we understand basic tradeoffs.
Re:A uBlock Origin update was rejected from the Chrome Web S... by smittywerben on Saturday October 12, 2019 @02:23PM (#21235119)
I've always thought "browser performance" was a trope (relic?) from when tabs were new and chrome did tabs the best.

If I can't have ublock origin, I'm going back to internet explorer 11.

Re:A uBlock Origin update was rejected from the Chrome Web S... by _eht on Saturday October 12, 2019 @12:29PM (#21234341)
I think you should look more in to FF financials. They are not exactly as liberated as you are thinking.

There is the Mozilla Foundation which holds all the IP, governs development, and provides supporting infrastructure.

Then there is the Mozilla Corporation-- the profit seeking portion of the conglomerate. They are guiding product development and contracts which will either bring profit now, or in the future. Think about their big forced Pocket feature. This is a future profit driver, if it is not already.

Source where FF gets the lions share of their funds.

I'm not saying they are bad, but use some critical thinking and stop making corporations heros, generally. Hold them accountable.

Be aware, use your voice, vote with your patronage.