News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Things you probably don't know about Go (2012) [slides] by astrobe_ on Thursday October 10, 2019 @02:56PM (#21217973)
> As a face-value claim, that's obviously untrue. Forth, by any reasonable metric, is a smaller language than Go, but I think you'd have a hard time claiming it's more productive.

I used Forth instead of Awk recently. What I wanted to do required to be more proficient than I am in Awk, while I am proficient in Forth. As you probably know, Forth is not exactly a string-oriented language.

There's no language more productive than others. But there are triplets (programmer, language, task) that are more productive than others.

Re:Things you probably don't know about Go (2012) [slides] by marcosdumay on Thursday October 10, 2019 @04:14PM (#21218703)
> there are triplets (programmer, language, task)

Well, any data on any such triplet will be highly nontransferable, to the point that it's useless. The challenge is finding minimum maps of generalized knowledge.