the more i think about it the more i notice that a lot of 'security' is actually used to verify or 'add value' to the data that gets mined meaning 'verified' traffic holds more value than non verified traffic so that might explain a reason why security protocols on routers and other common devices are not as secure as they could be. you could note that this is also a form of 'security against you' meaning a 'proof' for a court.

i don't know what the answer is to this simply because of all the variables i consider, especially the emergence of drones. how will this be secured to a degree that few can interfere with package deliveries, the abuse of surveillance and what space around a property is actually protected. as example you can drive by in a vehicle collect AP information and the average geek can obtain access so it will be with drones.

if you really want to get interesting, think about the things drones can do, such as compromise crime scenes with planted evidence.