Re:Sea 'Boiling' with Methane Discovered in Siberia
by klingonopera on Wednesday October 09, 2019 @12:03AM
(#21199899)
If the cost is the same as nuclear, it should be preferred, as there is no nuclear waste.
And that's probably even also considering that both the actual cost of nuclear[0][1][2][3], as well as the risk of failure[4][5] and the therein resulting costs[6] are often wildly underestimated.
And that's probably even also considering that both the actual cost of nuclear[0][1][2][3], as well as the risk of failure[4][5] and the therein resulting costs[6] are often wildly underestimated.
[0]: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/4631737.stm
[1]: https://www.pv-magazine.com/2019/01/31/debunking-the-low-cos...
[2]: https://financialtribune.com/articles/energy/9386/nuclear-de...
[3]: https://www.irishtimes.com/opinion/letters/true-cost-of-nucl...
[4]: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-4543400/Scie...
[5]: https://phys.org/news/2017-05-nuclear-greatly-underestimate-...
[6]: https://cleantechnica.com/2019/04/16/fukushimas-final-costs-...