News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:NBA's China dilemma: $4B at risk as Chinese TV cancels ga... by OJFord on Tuesday October 08, 2019 @04:56PM (#21197175)
> He will follow the party line and has (calling Hong Kong protestors “separatists”, etc.)

Is 'Hong Kong separatist' any different to 'Ulster unionist' in acceptability to each side? It sounds like a neutral description to me.

Re:NBA's China dilemma: $4B at risk as Chinese TV cancels ga... by godot on Tuesday October 08, 2019 @05:21PM (#21197397)
I don't know if it's neutral or not, but it's just factually incorrect. The five demands of the protestors (now six actually) do not include anything about separatism/independent state. (See: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2019_Hong_Kong_protests#Object...)

The fact that someone as prominent as Joe Tsai made such a factually incorrect public statement is a bit bothersome; and seems to suggest that there's truth in that Chinese media really wants to portray the protests as separatists movements (which is not true) to its people. (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reactions_to_the_2019_Hong_Kon...)

The thing is, Joe is right in the rest of his post -- everything about China's sensitivity to territories and separatists movements. It's that his categorization of Hong Kong's movement is wrong, which makes the whole argument invalid.