> the company is changing the CoC to require use of preferred pronouns
In other words, it's a policy whereby an individual may request to be addressed a certain way, and that request must be honoured.
Nothing more. Nothing less.
It sounds like you're the one generating false outrage.
NB: It's not exactly clear how/if she violated anything, in fact, it sounds to me like she did nothing wrong. But that's not the point I'm making: The point is that everything stems from this new policy.
See https://cellio.dreamwidth.org/2064709.html
> the company is changing the CoC to require use of preferred pronouns
In other words, it's a policy whereby an individual may request to be addressed a certain way, and that request must be honoured.
Nothing more. Nothing less.
It sounds like you're the one generating false outrage.
NB: It's not exactly clear how/if she violated anything, in fact, it sounds to me like she did nothing wrong. But that's not the point I'm making: The point is that everything stems from this new policy.