Re:Seattle looks to rein in state policy used to push back o...
by ganitarashid on Tuesday October 08, 2019 @03:15AM
(#21189583)
I don’t think anything would have to be enforced. Look at San Francisco or NYC. Most people wouldn’t want to have a family of 3 kids there because it’s too expensive.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Seattle looks to rein in state policy used to push back o...
by lazyasciiart on Tuesday October 08, 2019 @03:21AM
(#21189612)
No - they live in the suburbs of new developments and drive in to work there. Massively, unarguably a worse impact on the environment than building some condos downtown. It's like you think people will say oh well, can't afford San Francisco, I'll move to Detroit!
Re:Seattle looks to rein in state policy used to push back o...
by ganitarashid on Tuesday October 08, 2019 @04:34AM
(#21190024)
That’s true, good point. Then the prices of suburbs and new developments should be raised so high that they’re not worth building or moving to.
Re:Seattle looks to rein in state policy used to push back o...
by lazyasciiart on Thursday October 10, 2019 @02:39AM
(#21211596)
Byyyyy.......government enforcement or something?
Re:Seattle looks to rein in state policy used to push back o...
by lonelappde on Tuesday October 08, 2019 @08:14AM
(#21191350)
So you are anti people, not anti housing.
Re:Seattle looks to rein in state policy used to push back o...
by ganitarashid on Tuesday October 08, 2019 @01:42PM
(#21194857)
Anti growth is actually pro people