News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Street by Street, Amsterdam Is Cutting Cars Out of the Pi... by timerol on Monday October 07, 2019 @05:39PM (#21186224)
I agree with most of your points. However, these articles are mostly focused on removing cars from the ultra high-density areas where they are ineffective. Going from NYC to the Adirondacks for a backpacking trip? Can't beat a car. Going from the Upper West Side to Wall Street? Please don't drive, it makes everything worse for everyone, including yourself.

My personal opinion is that the HN crowd likes looking at transit in large cities as a complex optimization problem. There are a ton of variables to play with, and we're currently so far away from anything approaching optimum. Cars downtown give me the same feeling as a 10MB web site that has two paragraphs of content. We can do better than this.

Re:Street by Street, Amsterdam Is Cutting Cars Out of the Pi... by saalweachter on Monday October 07, 2019 @06:08PM (#21186502)
> Going from NYC to the Adirondacks for a backpacking trip? Can't beat a car.

Incidentally: https://www.adirondack.net/directions/getting-here-by-train/

Re:Street by Street, Amsterdam Is Cutting Cars Out of the Pi... by badfrog on Monday October 07, 2019 @06:15PM (#21186571)
> Every day, one train leaves New York City, travels through the Adirondacks, and ends up in Montreal. Another train follows the opposite route daily.

One train per day isn't exactly convenient. And once you get off the train, you still somehow need to get to the trail head.

Re:Street by Street, Amsterdam Is Cutting Cars Out of the Pi... by CydeWeys on Monday October 07, 2019 @06:45PM (#21186801)
For what it's worth, there's a super popular hiking spot 1.5 hours outside of NYC called Breakneck Ridge that is only served by a few MetroNorth trains per day (and only on weekends and holidays). And yet when I went there were MANY people doing it. That trailhead is close to the train station which is why it's so popular, but if it weren't, there's always Lyft/Uber.

These are city-dwellers who don't own cars doing these hikes, so "driving your own car" isn't even an option. Renting a car for the day/weekend is, but that's much more expensive than round-trip train tickets.

Re:Street by Street, Amsterdam Is Cutting Cars Out of the Pi... by badfrog on Monday October 07, 2019 @06:54PM (#21186866)
Yeah, it's great that these options exist. I've taken Metro North to hike on Mount Beacon before. But I still wouldn't say it's more convenient than a car.
Re:Street by Street, Amsterdam Is Cutting Cars Out of the Pi... by CydeWeys on Monday October 07, 2019 @07:16PM (#21187012)
It's not more convenient than a car that one day of the month, but not having a car is definitely more convenient the other 30 days of the month. Owning a car in NYC is super inconvenient and expensive.

Although I will say, the drive isn't that much faster than the train ride. And driving is dead time, whereas train riding time isn't.

Re:Street by Street, Amsterdam Is Cutting Cars Out of the Pi... by xyzzyz on Monday October 07, 2019 @05:53PM (#21186365)
Please don't drive, it makes everything worse for everyone, including yourself.

This assumes that people are simply so oblivious that they aren't aware of driving being worse for them. This can happen occasionally, but let me assure you that whenever you see people stuck in traffic, for overwhelming majority of them, being stuck in traffic is preferrable to alternatives. It might not be so to you, but they aren't you.

Don't assume stupidity, but rather try to understand why people would rather be stuck in traffic driving a single occupant vehicle than take a public bus. This way, you might learn things that could lead to improving public transit and making them more attractive to all.

Re:Street by Street, Amsterdam Is Cutting Cars Out of the Pi... by btrettel on Monday October 07, 2019 @06:43PM (#21186789)
I think many drivers have inaccurate views of how good the various alternatives are. As a cyclist, I've had drivers tell me over the years that going from A to B is practically impossible on a bike, but I often find it perfectly reasonable. (A and B are random locations picked by the driver I'm speaking with, e.g., often drivers say that getting groceries on a bike is impossible.) In my experience, most drivers never give cycling a fair chance.
Re:Street by Street, Amsterdam Is Cutting Cars Out of the Pi... by xyzzyz on Monday October 07, 2019 @06:53PM (#21186853)
Many people simply don't like physical activity. Of course, it would probably improve their health should they chose bicycle instead, but they aren't stupid or oblivious choosing to drive, nor is cycling objectively better. Some (in fact, probably a good majority of Americans) value less exertion and more convenience over health benefits or cash price. Maybe it would be better if they didn't, but compare it e.g. with reading books vs. watching TV. It might be better for society if people read more and watch TV less, but it would be silly to suggest that most TV watchers never give novels a fair chance, or express incredulity that some people are so oblivious that they prefer to watch TV instead of reading Dostoyevski.

In short, people have differing preferences, and your model of reality should account for that.

Re:Street by Street, Amsterdam Is Cutting Cars Out of the Pi... by btrettel on Monday October 07, 2019 @07:44PM (#21187216)
I acknowledge that people's preferences vary. I don't recommend cycling to everyone.

But I also believe many people are mistaken about their preferences. Using your example of physical activity, I find that people greatly overestimate how difficult cycling is when done regularly. Fact is, you'll get in better shape, and what was once far too hard becomes easy. Similarly, many people seem absolutely opposed to sweating at all and that seems to be what stops them from cycling. But I actually don't know a single transportation cyclist who takes a shower after their commute. Yes, they do sweat, but they find the amount of sweating acceptable.

There seems to be psychological research about this phenomena, e.g., here's a random article I found via Google: https://www.apa.org/science/about/psa/2004/04/pelham

Similarly, many people have views about cycling that are false. For example, I've talked to several drivers about buying groceries on a bike, and I was surprised by how few seem to consider that you can add cargo capacity to a bike. Groceries seems to be many anti-cycling drivers "gotcha" question, but it's really not a problem.

I don't think these things are obvious, but most drivers I've talked about these issues with seem to take very little initiative to investigate these assumptions. The easiest way would be to ask experienced cyclists.

Also: I don't think that I'm calling drivers stupid or oblivious. If you think I am, can you explain how?

Re:Street by Street, Amsterdam Is Cutting Cars Out of the Pi... by ip26 on Monday October 07, 2019 @07:58PM (#21187294)
I'm a bicycle commuter. It can get above 100F here and the desert sun is brutal. Before I rode an ebike, I definitely needed a shower in the summer.
Re:Street by Street, Amsterdam Is Cutting Cars Out of the Pi... by btrettel on Monday October 07, 2019 @08:13PM (#21187370)
In Austin, TX, I rarely have found that I truly need to take a shower, even when it's over 100 F. When I was less experienced this was more of a problem but now I reduce my speed, take a shorter route if possible, and change to a wet t-shirt and shorts that are different from what I normally wear. I used to also wear a wet skull cap but I've been meaning to buy a new one.

It helps that my commute is only about 5 to 10 minutes each way, but I'd keep cycling without taking a shower even if it was longer.

Anyhow, perhaps not all cyclists agree about the the necessity of showers. My point was that this is an issue where one's opinions may change.

Re:Street by Street, Amsterdam Is Cutting Cars Out of the Pi... by xyzzyz on Monday October 07, 2019 @08:30PM (#21187472)
But I also believe many people are mistaken about their preferences. Using your example of physical activity, I find that people greatly overestimate how difficult cycling is when done regularly.

Of course, I do agree with it. I can also confirm that going to gym regularly and getting jacked is not all that hard either. Nevertheless, median American is in terrible physical condition, obesity is rampant etc. Point is, there's quite apparently a wide chasm between knowing things, and actually restructuring your life according to those ideas: this requires committment, effort, planning, foresight etc. We gave up on expecting those things from average person in other areas (e.g. consider recent idea of "food deserts", which implicitly assumes that a person affected by those is unable to have enough foresight to make weekly or biweekly travels to grocery store, something our ancestors 100 years ago were perfectly capable of), so I find strange the incredulity of cycling proponents when it comes to understanding people shunning bicycles.

Similarly, many people have views about cycling that are false. For example, I've talked to several drivers about buying groceries on a bike, and I was surprised by how few seem to consider that you can add cargo capacity to a bike. Groceries seems to be many anti-cycling drivers "gotcha" question, but it's really not a problem.

There's no "gotcha". It's simply extremely convenient to do grocery shopping with a car compared to a bicycle, and adding cargo capacity only alleviates some of the inconvenience. The only reason people bring up groceries, or ferrying kids to school, or all the other excuses you've certainly heard fair share off is that when you say "car is simply more convenient to me", you're met with incredulity, and are being explained to, like the grand parent poster, that driving actually makes thing worse for you. You need to keep explaining the exact ways in which alternative ways are less convenient (less cargo capacity, more physical exertion required, more time spent on commuting with public transit etc), and the response is usually either minimizing the cost, or moralizing about health benefits or externalities.

I don't think these things are obvious, but most drivers I've talked about these issues with seem to take very little initiative to investigate these assumptions. The easiest way would be to ask experienced cyclists.

Indeed, "it's simply more convenient" is not the acceptable response here, you need to ask experts to tell you that you're wrong.

Also: I don't think that I'm calling drivers stupid or oblivious. If you think I am, can you explain how?

I don't think I quoted anyone calling drivers that, but the grandparent comment certainly implied that people driving in Manhattan are making choice that's simply wrong for them, which implies that they are either stupid, or, more charitably, oblivious.

Re:Street by Street, Amsterdam Is Cutting Cars Out of the Pi... by btrettel on Monday October 07, 2019 @10:12PM (#21188005)
I'm only "incredulous" if the anti-cycling arguments don't make sense. Personally, I don't have a major problem with the "ferrying kids around" argument. But the groceries argument is much weaker than you believe it is, and I'd encourage you to try buying groceries via cargo bike in a reasonably bike-friendly place sometime.

If the main argument against cycling is "seems like too much effort for me to figure out how to make cycling work", okay, I can understand that. But that's not what people have been telling me, so it's not what I have been responding to. (That's not to say it isn't something I should be responding to.)

Re:Street by Street, Amsterdam Is Cutting Cars Out of the Pi... by maxaf on Monday October 07, 2019 @06:09PM (#21186511)
I wish I could upvote you twice!

I’m one of the minority of Manhattan residents who use a private car instead of transit. My schedule and routes are unusual enough that transit doesn’t serve me. Even when doing a more traditional UWS->Financial District commute, I often prefer to drive because of the knock-on benefits: I can shop at Eataly and bring home some goodies for the family; I can make stops at a few stores along the way that would otherwise be too far from the standard subway commute route. I don’t enjoy sitting in traffic, but it’s so much easier for me than any other alternative. I pick my travel times to minimize delays for myself (and presumably others) and I’m tired of being labeled an entitled snob, an idiot, or a murderer of cyclists.

Re:Street by Street, Amsterdam Is Cutting Cars Out of the Pi... by xyzzyz on Monday October 07, 2019 @06:25PM (#21186650)
Indeed. I'm a west coast resident, and I've only visited NYC a handful of times, but last time I was there with my family, I rode cabs about as much as subway: in my limited experience, subway in Manhattan works well if you're moving on north-south axis, but not so well on east-west axis. When you're going east-west in Manhattan, you have to spend 15-20 minutes walking more often than not, which is usually not that bad, unless it's 95 degrees outside, and your children are miserable: spending 20 minutes in air conditioned cab then is much preferrable to spending 15 minutes walking in that circumstance. In that scenario, cabs also win often with subway, especially on short routes, since you can move 4 people with a single cab fare, while you have to pay 4 times the fare when you take the subway.
Re:Street by Street, Amsterdam Is Cutting Cars Out of the Pi... by badfrog on Monday October 07, 2019 @06:17PM (#21186582)
> I can make stops at a few stores along the way that would otherwise be too far from the standard subway commute route.

Where are you stopping between UWS and FiDi that has convenient parking?

Re:Street by Street, Amsterdam Is Cutting Cars Out of the Pi... by maxaf on Monday October 07, 2019 @06:28PM (#21186668)
There are metered parking zones all over Manhattan. Many are commercial-only during the day, but revert to regular meters after a certain hour. There are copious bus lanes on many major thoroughfares, which are legal to park in outside of peak commuting hours. In some areas the street sweeper dance starts the evening before, leaving many spots unoccupied after drivers have absconded in search of parking spaces that won’t see a sweeper while the drivers are at work the next day.

I use all of these hacks and more to make it possible to zip around town in a personal car.

Re:Street by Street, Amsterdam Is Cutting Cars Out of the Pi... by cardiffspaceman on Monday October 07, 2019 @09:28PM (#21187798)
I attended a Seder on upper Park Ave, Manhattan, which had 3 people who used cars, including the rabbi who lives in Manhattan. One party was a visitor from out of town. The streets do look like rivers of cabs but I spot private cars and not all of those have ride share stickers.