Re:Joint Statement on the GNU Project
by dtornabene on Monday October 07, 2019 @03:10PM
(#21184755)
I'm going to go with: So women can participate without having to be asked out on dates? So they don't feel harassed? You want to run cover for people do it in your own org man. This is beyond obtuse.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
> So women can participate without having to be asked out on dates?
What is so wrong about being asked by a man for a date? I (a man) have been asked lots of times for a date by women I worked with, some of them my superiors. Mostly I said "no", because I generally don't like mixing love life with work life, but the best relationship I've ever had was the time I said "yes". I don't see why RMS couldn't look for such a relationship.
In $CURRENT_YEAR it's considered harassment for a woman to be asked on a date by an insufficiently attractive man.
If Stallman looked like Chris Hemsworth, women would join the GNU Project for the opportunity to ask him on a date.
Actually, in a spooky way RMS _does_ look like Hemsworth in the last Avengers film.
This answer has nothing to do with the questions I proposed. I'm asking why these people who proclaim to be as good as or better than Stallman are only now stepping up.
What Stallman's dirty laundry is has been thoroughly discussed.
Re:Joint Statement on the GNU Project
by dtornabene on Monday October 07, 2019 @03:18PM
(#21184854)
"these people" have been in free software for decades champ. I met Chris Webber in chicago, at free software events literally 10 years ago. Andy Wingo is similarly long term involved. Keep eliding everything actually about this to throw up straw men. Its clarifying, as I noted in another thread. And, his "dirty laundry" is driving women out of spaces supposedly dedicated to freedom. Not sure why thats so difficult.