Re:U.S. Supreme Court rejects Amazon warehouse worker wage a...
by mlyle on Monday October 07, 2019 @03:06PM
(#21184721)
> I find that completely unpersuasive. The courts have just told Amazon that they DON'T HAVE TO PAY for this time.
The headline is a little misleading. The appellate court was letting the case vs. Amazon go to trial under state labor law; the Supreme Court decided not to intervene, so the dispute is still being litigated.
(Previously, the Supreme Court said time being screening doesn't require compensation under Federal law).
The headline is a little misleading. The appellate court was letting the case vs. Amazon go to trial under state labor law; the Supreme Court decided not to intervene, so the dispute is still being litigated.
(Previously, the Supreme Court said time being screening doesn't require compensation under Federal law).