Re:For the first time on record, the 400 wealthiest American...
by Supermancho on Monday October 07, 2019 @12:59PM
(#21183148)
> Per their own sentence, the poor and rich are audited at the same rate yet they go on to label this "disproportionate". That makes no sense.
60% of 1000 is less than 60% of 2 million. The cost/benefit of auditing the poor is likely inverted at a small scale. At a large scale, it's the right call. It makes sense, from a particular point of view.
60% of 1000 is less than 60% of 2 million. The cost/benefit of auditing the poor is likely inverted at a small scale. At a large scale, it's the right call. It makes sense, from a particular point of view.