Re:U.S. Supreme Court rejects Amazon warehouse worker wage a...
by Frondo on Monday October 07, 2019 @12:57PM
(#21183123)
This could be addressed by having more labor-conscious journalists and headline writers.
Framing it that way, of course people would respond negatively to price increases.
"Amazon workers now paid for all the time they're clocked in, prices may be affected" is a lot more sympathetic to workers.
Re:U.S. Supreme Court rejects Amazon warehouse worker wage a...
by blaser-waffle on Tuesday October 08, 2019 @09:07AM
(#21191826)
Labor conscious writers mean nothing if their editors (and newspaper / website / whatever) owners disagree. Ultimately the wordsmiths need to get paid, too, and they write what gets them money -- which is what their bosses want to print.
Re:U.S. Supreme Court rejects Amazon warehouse worker wage a...
by stallmanite on Monday October 07, 2019 @02:17PM
(#21184187)
I feel like they're labor conscious they just don't give a fuck or are actively opposed.
I'm with you though, it costs the consumer nothing.