Re:U.S. Supreme Court rejects Amazon warehouse worker wage a...
by tom_mellior on Monday October 07, 2019 @12:02PM
(#21182453)
Being locked up at work without compensation. I guess the Constitution's "involuntary servitude" wording was meant for other contexts (actual 24/7 slavery), but this still seems like a basic human rights violation. But maybe the US Supreme Court doesn't view itself as a human rights court, so I don't know. That's why I asked.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:U.S. Supreme Court rejects Amazon warehouse worker wage a...
by s1artibartfast on Monday October 07, 2019 @02:53PM
(#21184579)
That simply isn't how the Supreme (or any) court works. Perhaps there is a servitude issue at hand, but that is not the argument that the plaintiff made.
Re:U.S. Supreme Court rejects Amazon warehouse worker wage a...
by tom_mellior on Tuesday October 08, 2019 @04:26AM
(#21189986)
So what you're saying is that this is exactly how the Supreme Court works if someone comes and makes an appropriate argument?