Re:Scientist Who Discredited Meat Guidelines Didn’t Report P...
by Sawamara on Saturday October 05, 2019 @12:49PM
(#21166522)
But this is exactly the point of studies like this. They are written in a way that allows misinterpretation, and then the media can pick it up and run with it (like they did with this one).
There is a large body of writing about P-hacking, bias in studies, this is just one more in that long, long list.
Personally, if something will make a low occurence event marginally safer, I might not care. That's what this paper is saying.
Perhaps a scientific paper isn't the place for that (an article about the paper probably is) but that translated data is still relevant to a certain perspective.