News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Startup Visa Canada by fleitz on Tuesday January 18, 2011 @08:03AM (#2115609)
The biggest reasons to do a startup in Canada are SRED claims, , depressed wages (in Vancouver), and enforceable non-competes.

People say Vancouver is the best place to live, but I'd rather live elsewhere, Portland or SF come to mind.

Re:Startup Visa Canada by halostatue on Tuesday January 18, 2011 @08:09AM (#2115627)
Enforceable non-competes may vary by province; I haven't had a reason to check it out, but they may be against labour law in Ontario.
Re:Startup Visa Canada by dotBen on Tuesday January 18, 2011 @03:17PM (#2117199)
Enforceable probably only in Canada. I doubt there is little to no legal redress for anyone competing across the border, esp in California which bans non-competes.

I personally wouldn't put an employee under a non-compete - a) because they tend to be unenforceable and b) I wouldn't work under such a contract myself.

Re:Startup Visa Canada by halostatue on Tuesday January 18, 2011 @03:50PM (#2117324)
After I got into work, I did a quick search and found that it's not under labour law as such, but Ontario courts (and presumably Canadian courts in general) frown on non-competes. This article from 1999 suggest that non-solicitation agreements are acceptable, but there's nine conditions that make a non-compete acceptable because it's an 'exceptional' situation.

http://www.zvulony.com/non_compete.html

This is upheld in other articles that I've read that are more recent:

http://www.toronto-employmentlawyer.com/law-advice/employmen... http://blogs.hrhero.com/northernexposure/2008/10/14/noncompe... http://www.brazeauseller.com/articles/29/12/2008/245.aspx

Re:Startup Visa Canada by halostatue on Tuesday January 18, 2011 @03:49PM (#2117320)
After I got into work, I did a quick search and found that it's not under labour law as such, but Ontario courts (and presumably Canadian courts in general) frown on non-competes. This article from 1999 suggest that non-solicitation agreements are acceptable, but there's nine conditions that make a non-compete acceptable because it's an 'exceptional' situation.

http://www.zvulony.com/non_compete.html

This is upheld in other articles that I've read that are more recent:

http://www.toronto-employmentlawyer.com/law-advice/employmen... http://blogs.hrhero.com/northernexposure/2008/10/14/noncompe... http://www.brazeauseller.com/articles/29/12/2008/245.aspx