Re:Dutch police take down hornets' nest of DDoS botnets
by zaarn on Thursday October 03, 2019 @06:00AM
(#21145276)
It's mandatory if the newspaper want to continue being a respected newspaper. So for all intents and purposes it's mandatory.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Dutch police take down hornets' nest of DDoS botnets
by archi42 on Thursday October 03, 2019 @07:57AM
(#21145955)
I can second this. You don't read the full names of suspects (!) in a newspaper in Germany. I believe this is actually due to the law here (e.g. if they're innocent, their name is not ruined). That is somewhat relaxed, as long as they're not a public figure (e.g. no one would say "Angela M. is suspected to be a physicist" if it's about the German Chancellor) and as long as it's clear from the article that they're not (yet) convicted.
Can't speak for the rest of Europe of course.
Re:Dutch police take down hornets' nest of DDoS botnets
by Doxin on Thursday October 03, 2019 @10:43AM
(#21147558)
Well I dunno about germany but over here in the netherlands there's no real law about not using full names. However if a paper does use someones full name and then that person gets their reputation ruined they will usually get a lower sentence if guilty. The idea being that getting your reputation ruined is a punishment in itself.
Re:Dutch police take down hornets' nest of DDoS botnets
by Confusion on Thursday October 03, 2019 @11:01AM
(#21147821)
There is currently a court case against a drugs kingpin where one of the reputable newspapers does mention his full name, but each time followed by "-- the suspect's lawyer has indicated the suspect has no objection to his full name being used" (once per article of course)
Re:Dutch police take down hornets' nest of DDoS botnets
by hobofan on Thursday October 03, 2019 @01:10PM
(#21149262)
"Proper" newspapers don't, but yellow press (e.g. BILD) which is consumed by a large chunk of the German population doesn't really care that much about preserving privacy or correctly reporting on conviction status.