News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Hong Kong protest safety app banned from iOS store by IntelMiner on Thursday October 03, 2019 @04:00AM (#21144703)
One has to wonder though. Apple refused to provide the FBI a backdoor, which people speculated would be due to setting a precedent for Apple to make these backdoors standard

How likely is it that everything Apple sells in China is backdoored as mandated by the CCP?

Re:Hong Kong protest safety app banned from iOS store by kop316 on Thursday October 03, 2019 @07:43AM (#21145853)
Very likely:

https://support.apple.com/en-us/HT208351

They allow a Chinese company to manage iCloud data.

Re:Hong Kong protest safety app banned from iOS store by chillydawg on Thursday October 03, 2019 @04:04AM (#21144724)
It's clearly 100%.
Re:Hong Kong protest safety app banned from iOS store by asxd on Thursday October 03, 2019 @04:09AM (#21144745)
What about the infamous browser attack publicized by Google’s project zero that seemed to be perpetrated by the Chinese government in order to target the Uighur Muslims? If true that would seem to imply the CCP did not in fact have backdoors already right?
Re:Hong Kong protest safety app banned from iOS store by SSLy on Thursday October 03, 2019 @04:26AM (#21144824)
It was targeting the Diaspora, which was using non-China models.
Re:Hong Kong protest safety app banned from iOS store by asxd on Thursday October 03, 2019 @05:05AM (#21144997)
Ah, interesting, "Diaspora" meaning Uighurs outside of China? In that case though, what evidence is there that it was geographically targeted? My understanding was that the attack apparently focused on websites likely to be visited by Uighurs, so how would we know what the geographical target was?
Re:Hong Kong protest safety app banned from iOS store by lern_too_spel on Thursday October 03, 2019 @10:01AM (#21147010)
The targeted websites are blocked in China. They are only accessible outside of China.
Re:Hong Kong protest safety app banned from iOS store by asxd on Thursday October 03, 2019 @12:56PM (#21149108)
Thanks for clarifying, I didn’t realize that!