Re:Dutch police take down hornets' nest of DDoS botnets
by Ligrev on Thursday October 03, 2019 @03:08AM
(#21144474)
Bos means a forest, likely nothing to do with his name
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Dutch police take down hornets' nest of DDoS botnets
by jbverschoor on Thursday October 03, 2019 @03:11AM
(#21144485)
It’s a normal Dutch last name.
Also, the naming of the holdings is the same. So they probably registered it at the same time. Anyway, information can always be checked at the chamber of commerce
Re:Dutch police take down hornets' nest of DDoS botnets
by krageon on Thursday October 03, 2019 @03:39AM
(#21144611)
It costs 2.50 to check the names of the owners of these companies at the chamber of commerce if that makes you doubt whether or not it's actually the name. This means that the owners were effectively outed by the publication anyway.
Re:Dutch police take down hornets' nest of DDoS botnets
by systemtest on Thursday October 03, 2019 @09:12AM
(#21146528)
Especially with the UBO-register* it will be very easy to see which (natural) persons are tied to a company.
* Ultimate Beneficial Owner
Re:Dutch police take down hornets' nest of DDoS botnets
by avar on Thursday October 03, 2019 @03:48AM
(#21144647)
Not really, the point of Dutch privacy law (and similar EU laws) in this context is not to deter a dedicated investigator, but to merely put enough of a hurdle in place that everyone reading the article won't see the names of suspects, and they won't show up in web searches etc.
Re:Dutch police take down hornets' nest of DDoS botnets
by xaitv on Thursday October 03, 2019 @04:06AM
(#21144730)
Iirc it's not even an actual law, more of an agreement between all news organizations to not publish names like that. I seem to recall Geenstijl(Dutch "news" site) publishing full names and not getting in trouble over it.
Re:Dutch police take down hornets' nest of DDoS botnets
by Fnoord on Thursday October 03, 2019 @08:39AM
(#21146261)
Geenstijl doesn't have high journalist standards.
Re:Dutch police take down hornets' nest of DDoS botnets
by wwwhizz on Thursday October 03, 2019 @10:27AM
(#21147352)
But they do have to follow the law, which is his point.
Re:Dutch police take down hornets' nest of DDoS botnets
by Fnoord on Thursday October 03, 2019 @10:31AM
(#21147402)
Sometimes there is no law necessary because an industry regulates themselves. Which the Dutch press historically has done so, in this example.
Re:Dutch police take down hornets' nest of DDoS botnets
by krageon on Thursday October 03, 2019 @08:10AM
(#21146051)
If the bar for being a "dedicated investigator" is copy-pasting a string and paying 2.50, I think we just have different views on this. Your views about the intent of specific laws aren't relevant, as there are AFAIK no laws about news publications that apply to what we are talking about.
Re:Dutch police take down hornets' nest of DDoS botnets
by gpvos on Thursday October 03, 2019 @04:05AM
(#21144727)
The convention (I don't think it's actually a law) existed before web searches, but it's a nice side effect.
Re:Dutch police take down hornets' nest of DDoS botnets
by nightchalk16 on Thursday October 03, 2019 @04:40AM
(#21144879)
Not true.
Not mentioning lastnames is only a convention by journalists and the media. Publishing lastnames in the media is not a violation of the law. News website geenstijl.nl regularly publishes full names of suspects or criminals.
The convention already existed before the internet.
Update: I should have read more comments...