In addition to that, after reading this guy's ideas, do you not see how it's absolutely against google's goal of higher diversity? It's honestly terribly written. They go from "google's biases," to "stop alienating conservatives."
Then they go on about how it's bad we let less experienced women in tech, comparing it to mandated increases in home-less women. What the fuck?
You disavowed Damore's stance because it has been interpreted in a way you think is wrong and offensive.
You can't disavow both of these at the same time without contradicting your claimed intent (of wanting to hear facts that the left is offended by).
It's obvious, based on your reaction to Damore's stance, that you are offended by, if not the Gender Equality Paradox, something extremely adjacent to the Gender Equality Paradox.
There is no gender discrimination related to pay in the younger portion of the US workforce.
Obviously, the mockery of "free speech" as "freeze peach" is because the meaning behind that, for a lot of people complaining about it, is that they would like to say something hateful. It's so frequent that it's become a meme.
It's unfortunate, and places that put an emphasis on free speech are shitholes like gab and voat. They would like whatever hate they're selling to have a bigger audience, and it's not really on corporations to provide that.
I would say the term has been co-opted by the right in online spaces, which makes it hard to talk about. It's no longer classical "free speech," almost always you have ask, "what were you trying to say with that free speech?"
Are they being banned for being anti-government? Anti-bank? Anti-military? Anti-religion? The pro- versions of those? Or is it maybe something else. Your vision of a "leftist" crack down, could be interpreted as the "right" getting more extreme and being banned.