> I normally wouldn't respond to a post like this, but if you are thinking about hurting people that you disagree with, please seek out some help. This sentence honestly reads like a warning flag to me for someone who has reached their limit for debating peacefully with others.

Yeah, that "how little you've respected honest discourse and conversation" comment seems a little self-revealing especially when coupled with that latest edit.

This is definitely "I was just threatening you as a hypothetical, bro!" territory

They are talking about violence that you yourself had posited would be occurring in the context of an armed insurgency, which is a hypothetical that you posed. You're now twisting their response to your own example into something you're interpreting as a generalized wish for violence on people they disagree with, totally ignoring of the context of the conversation up to this point.

I feel bad for someone like you; needing to twist reality to get somewhere.

You realize everyone in this comment thread can see my comment, right above yours, right? Willfully misinterpreting what I've written to seem hostile when in reality it's you who suggested Americans should kill each other.

You must need a win, and we've all been there, but insurgency isn't what the 2nd Amendment was about, it never was, and lying won't change that fact.