News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Belgian startup Magnax has found a way to mass-produce th... by qubex on Tuesday October 01, 2019 @08:50AM (#21124738)
I’m absolutely ignorant on the topic of aircraft propulsion, but I’d always assumed that the diminishing mass of fuel that one was carrying around with oneself as the flight progresses is a key advantage that electric-propulsion aircraft can never hope to replicate (short of dropping battery packs with parachutes as they become exhausted of charge).

Am I absolutely wrong or is it not actually much of a factor?

Re:Belgian startup Magnax has found a way to mass-produce th... by AdrianB1 on Tuesday October 01, 2019 @09:26AM (#21125047)
You are right in the way you are thinking, but you don't have the full information: in a 600 kg plane the fuel is 100kg. The mass reduction does not make such a big impact, especially as you rarely top the tanks (you can carry more luggage or a heavier pilot & passenger) and you never empty it (30 minute reserve is usually raised to 1 hour reserve), so you have a 10% variation of the total mass of the plane on regular flights: no significant impact.

On the other side, large planes carry a lot more fuel as a percentage of the total mass, it really matters to them.

Re:Belgian startup Magnax has found a way to mass-produce th... by Filligree on Tuesday October 01, 2019 @09:28AM (#21125069)
I hope to hear actual pilots chiming in, but from first principles:

It shouldn't be a large factor. Drag is independent of mass, and while lifting the fuel to cruising altitude takes energy, most of the flight should ideally be cruising.

The rocket equation doesn't apply; that's for an entirely different regime.

Re:Belgian startup Magnax has found a way to mass-produce th... by skykooler on Tuesday October 01, 2019 @10:09AM (#21125469)
While drag is "independent" of mass, the lift required to maintain level flight is affected by weight, and drag is affected by lift. A heavier airplane will absolutely require more power to cruise.