News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:New research questions the evidence for health benefits o... by bpodgursky on Monday September 30, 2019 @06:22PM (#21120226)
The Harvard response undercuts itself by bringing up "environmental sustainability"

It isn't wrong, but it seriously calls into question whether the aim of the recommendation against red meat purely accurate nutrition science or a broader agenda.

Re:New research questions the evidence for health benefits o... by dahdum on Monday September 30, 2019 @07:16PM (#21120561)
That was my first thought too. Unless they’ve done research on the future health impacts of climate change, including it weakens their argument.
Re:New research questions the evidence for health benefits o... by WomanCanCode on Monday September 30, 2019 @11:12PM (#21121687)
I think this is an important distinction. If something should be unhealthy for consumption then it has to be because of ingesting it and not because of how it will impact the market or environment.
Re:New research questions the evidence for health benefits o... by humble_engineer on Monday September 30, 2019 @08:07PM (#21120829)
Its absolutely ridiculous that people are down voting you. I'm not eating bugs.