News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:New research questions the evidence for health benefits o... by asdf21 on Monday September 30, 2019 @05:32PM (#21119854)
I've known this for years, and own a restaurant that serves all of our fried food cooked in beef tallow rather than seed oils.

Everyone loves the taste of the food, I guess our fries ruin other chains for people.

Re:New research questions the evidence for health benefits o... by sleavey on Monday September 30, 2019 @05:38PM (#21119904)
The thing that really irks me about seed oils is that humans find it difficult to taste when it's rancid. I wonder how many of the long shelf life products filled with sunflower oil are actually rancid, or how many fast food restaurants use oil long past its normal life without anyone being able to tell.
Re:New research questions the evidence for health benefits o... by inetknght on Monday September 30, 2019 @05:48PM (#21120006)
As far as I understand, Rancid just means it doesn't taste as good as it should but generally doesn't otherwise result in less-healthy or less-nutritious food. Am I incorrect?
Re:New research questions the evidence for health benefits o... by sleavey on Monday September 30, 2019 @05:59PM (#21120082)
I'm not an expert, but I think rancid oil is oxidised oil and thus acts like any oxidised chemical: it tries to steal an electron from somewhere else, including inside our bodies - "free radicals" - which can damage things like our DNA. There's also some link to how it can change the behaviour of proton gradients in our cells (I read about it a while ago in "The Vital Question" by Nick Lane) but I'm sketchy on the exact details.
Re:New research questions the evidence for health benefits o... by p10_user on Monday September 30, 2019 @07:16PM (#21120564)
If it’s already oxidized it’s not trying to steal any electrons - the oxygen already has. Case in point - CO2 is the most oxidized form of carbon and is very low energy and nonreactive.
Re:New research questions the evidence for health benefits o... by dnhz on Monday September 30, 2019 @11:15PM (#21121705)
It depends on the chemical. CO2 is not electrophilic, but something like an aldehyde, typically biochemically formed by oxidation, is electrophilic and reactive. The body biochemically oxidizes ethanol to acetaldehyde, whose reactivity gives it carcinogenic properties. Toxic aldehydes formed when fats degrade include acrolein and malondialdehyde: "Malondialdehyde results from lipid peroxidation of polyunsaturated fatty acids."

1. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Acetaldehyde 2. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Malondialdehyde

Re:New research questions the evidence for health benefits o... by inetknght on Monday September 30, 2019 @06:08PM (#21120131)
But that oxidation would occur anyway whether it's on a shelf over time or inside of our body... wouldn't it?
Re:New research questions the evidence for health benefits o... by sleavey on Monday September 30, 2019 @06:14PM (#21120171)
The high temperatures used to fry foods accelerates oxidation. Repeatedly using the same oil to fry foods at high temperatures (such as in factories and restaurants) leads to greater oxidation. Long shelf life food often has oil or was fried in oil that was heated to high temperatures. However, just leaving oil long enough exposed to air will also lead to oxidation, just at a slower rate (though I think highly refined oils, like those used not for cooking, have a slower or negligible oxidation rate "in air" but are usually not edible).
Re:New research questions the evidence for health benefits o... by kortex on Monday September 30, 2019 @07:28PM (#21120625)
Might be one of those genetic things, or conditioned response. I'm extremely sensitive to the oxidized oil note. But my partner doesn't really notice it until it's gag-inducing to me. E.g. I can't eat mixed nuts if they have been opened more than a few days (regardless of how well re-sealed)
Re:New research questions the evidence for health benefits o... by sleavey on Tuesday October 01, 2019 @04:05AM (#21123092)
Interesting! Yes, possibly genes have some role here. Alternatively I've heard that your taste is affected by your body nutrient levels. A friend of mine found they could not taste zinc sulfate until they started supplementing it. Once they supplemented it, it tasted really bitter.
Re:New research questions the evidence for health benefits o... by saagarjha on Monday September 30, 2019 @05:49PM (#21120014)
If you can’t tell, why does it matter whether it’s rancid or not?
Re:New research questions the evidence for health benefits o... by jackfoxy on Monday September 30, 2019 @05:50PM (#21120024)
McDonald's used to fry fries in beef tallow, but caved to the settled health science of the day in 1983.

Here's the recipe to fry your own. https://grannysvitalvittles.com/stovetop-beef-tallow-french-...

Re:New research questions the evidence for health benefits o... by lazyasciiart on Monday September 30, 2019 @06:20PM (#21120210)
I don't know why that site thinks it happened in 1983, but McDonalds stopped using beef tallow for fries in 1990 (in the US) because a really rich guy decided they should and was willing to put millions of dollars into making that happen. Phil Sokolof obituary - https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-2004-apr-16-me-sokol...
Re:New research questions the evidence for health benefits o... by asdf21 on Monday September 30, 2019 @05:51PM (#21120035)
Yep, we tell people that all the time.

We do our fries like McDonalds did in the fifties.

Re:New research questions the evidence for health benefits o... by thrownblown on Monday September 30, 2019 @06:22PM (#21120228)
Checkout Malcolm Gladwells podcast regarding how MickieDees abandoned the beef fat.

http://revisionisthistory.com/episodes/19-mcdonalds-broke-my...