Re:In Defense of Richard Stallman
by andrewgioia on Monday September 30, 2019 @10:40AM
(#21115829)
Holy strawman, batman! This is so bad I felt inclined to comment.
Neither OP nor RMS said "child sexual abuse is okay" or wants to say that--you know that, right? Why are you phrasing it that way?
The only rational interpretation is that you're deliberately misrepresenting things, which is ironically one of the main thrusts of the linked article. The language used here is important, as are forums like this one.
Re:In Defense of Richard Stallman
by DanBC on Monday September 30, 2019 @04:49PM
(#21119539)
RMS has previously said that child sexual abuse is not harmful. He's said that the harms of incest can be avoided if people use condoms. He's called for the "end of censorship of child pornography".
Neither OP nor RMS said "child sexual abuse is okay" or wants to say that--you know that, right? Why are you phrasing it that way?
The only rational interpretation is that you're deliberately misrepresenting things, which is ironically one of the main thrusts of the linked article. The language used here is important, as are forums like this one.