News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The perils of short-termism by watwut on Monday September 30, 2019 @09:10AM (#21114947)
100 years ago is right after first world war. The kids were dying a lot and what was acceptable back then would caused CPS calls on you. It is not merely "want" to keep up with legal standards. Moreover, the world back then was pretty violent and kids were violent or delinquent too, especially when looking at Europe. There was quite a lot of price to be paid for situation back then.

The areas with high unemployment and high social problems are perceived as undesirable places to live in for a reason. Of course I don't need to live in area with low alcoholism rates, low unemployment and low amount of social problems. But I want to live there for good reasons, namely better chance for me and my kids to not become unemployed and hopeless.

Re:The perils of short-termism by keiferski on Monday September 30, 2019 @09:49AM (#21115289)
The entire South and Midwest have social problems?
Re:The perils of short-termism by watwut on Monday September 30, 2019 @10:10AM (#21115496)
The places where people don't go tend to have more of them. People don't go there for a reason. The entire South and Midwest have places where people do go.

What you don't have is a paradise where everything is cheap, there is a lot of employment and other opportunities and people somehow refuse to go to in the long term. You have cheap places where there is basically single major employer or low earning industry.

I am not saying that people always have it perfectly right, but in the long term and on average, the mass moves where it makes sense to move to. Those places then become more expensive.