News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:In Defense of Richard Stallman by CogitoCogito on Monday September 30, 2019 @08:08AM (#21114376)
> You can start here: https://medium.com/@selamjie/remove-richard-stallman-appendi...

Start with what exactly? What is this in response to?

Re:In Defense of Richard Stallman by TeMPOraL on Monday September 30, 2019 @09:47AM (#21115272)
This is a follow-up post of the blogger that started the RMS witch hunt.
Re:In Defense of Richard Stallman by pron on Tuesday October 01, 2019 @09:57AM (#21125355)
According to his closest colleagues, there was no witch hunt, but a high-profile incident that drew attention to literally decades of problems: https://medium.com/@thomas.bushnell/a-reflection-on-the-depa...
Re:In Defense of Richard Stallman by TeMPOraL on Tuesday October 01, 2019 @03:27PM (#21129541)
Sure there wasn't, no Vice and Forbes articles, no shitstorm all over Twitter and Mastodon, no angry blogposts full of bile spreading lies, no decades of problems suddenly drawing attention, no long HN threads. I must have imagined it.
Re:In Defense of Richard Stallman by pron on Tuesday October 01, 2019 @03:58PM (#21129885)
Well, people actually familiar with the situation say that you have (at least the witch hunt aspect), so unless you know better than them, I'd say yeah.

According to those actually familiar with the case, certain recent actions by Stallman drew attention to his problematic decades-long behavior, which finally resulted, after decades of ignored complaints, in his dismissal.

There's no denying the well-established fact that the vast majority of cases of inappropriate behavior goes unpunished; in a few cases, some media attention can lead to action. The percentage of bad actors (and according to those closest to him, Stallman is a bad actor) that are finally disciplined remains, sadly, very low, but it's a start.

There are always hysterics who cry about a PC mob or witch hunts, but those who are interested in the facts, take the time to Google for relevant studies, consider the numbers, and as those shrill claims just don't square with the facts, so are best ignored.