News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Plane Tests Must Use Average Pilots, NTSB Says After 737 ... by kayfox on Friday September 27, 2019 @12:16PM (#21093559)
AoA Disagree was supposed to be turned on on all 737 MAXs, but it depended on AoA indication, which was an option. This was a mistake Boeing admitted to and has since corrected.

Options are not all tied to fees, the process of ordering an airplane is quite complicated because of the immense amount of customization each airline does before they even pay for the aircraft. Its unclear how much this option cost, if it cost anything.

The reason why AoA indication is an option is that it requires more advanced training for the pilots, some airlines provide this training and some do not. The airlines are the ultimate decider on how much training pilots will get, Boeing and the FAA can only set minimums.

Re:Plane Tests Must Use Average Pilots, NTSB Says After 737 ... by computerex on Friday September 27, 2019 @07:59PM (#21097352)
Do you have any official sources to support anything you're saying? It seems unbelievable to me that Boeing would introduce MCAS, a complete flight characteristics "augmentation" system and pass it off as a standard 737 without any special training, but would only offer AoA indication as an option due to training.