Re:Stallman Still Heading the GNU Project
by virgilp on Friday September 27, 2019 @09:58AM
(#21092030)
What is the exact unacceptable behaviour that you linked to? (Sorry, navigating twitter sucks, I honestly am unsure what you're talking about). From the second link I get two things - second-hand tale that "he gets touchy" (hasn't ever happened to her directly I guess? Or we would've known). And first-hand tale that he abused organizers by instructing them how to make tea; she assumes it's because organizers are women, but from what I know RMS would abuse organizers regardless of gender. He was weird and hard to live with, much less please. Yes I can believe that (it's something that Miguel de Icaza apparently complains about). But this is not a crime!
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Stallman Still Heading the GNU Project
by dependenttypes on Friday September 27, 2019 @11:24AM
(#21092972)
The tea case and the de Icaza case might not be crimes but they are still unacceptable behaviour imo.
Re:Stallman Still Heading the GNU Project
by virgilp on Friday September 27, 2019 @01:41PM
(#21094347)
You don't have to like him to recognise injustice.
People are literally celebrating a "long overdue" injustice because they don't like the man, so "he had it coming". I don't know how can anyone not find this unsetting.
Re:Stallman Still Heading the GNU Project
by dependenttypes on Saturday September 28, 2019 @06:10AM
(#21099503)
> You don't have to like him to recognise injustice.
I never said otherwise. If you look at my comment history you will see that I am against the injustice against RMS.