Pi-Hole 4.3.2 - Hackdot

Re:Pi-Hole 4.3.2 by PureParadigm on Friday September 27, 2019 @01:12AM (#21088646)

Thanks for your answer. I think the sources you linked to are tunneling all of their DNS queries through Wireguard. I don't want to do this, since my work has some DNS records which only resolve internally. Basically I want to be able to give DNS names to the various hosts on my Wireguard network, while falling back to the DNS provided by the network I'm on.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Pi-Hole 4.3.2 by ignoramous on Friday September 27, 2019 @02:39AM (#21089090)

In the config:

DNS = <public-resolver>,<private-reslover>

...wouldn't work?

Edit: per discussion on r/Wireguard, looks like one soln is to run dnsmasq locally on ::53 and forward public queries to the VPN/DNS provider of your choosing and resolve private queries locally.

https://www.reddit.com/r/WireGuard/comments/cmhap6/use_both_...

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Pi-Hole 4.3.2 by PureParadigm on Saturday September 28, 2019 @10:45PM (#21104695)

Yeah, thanks for looking deeper into it. I found before that I could do it by running my own DNS server (like dnsmasq) on the local device (so I could do it no problem on my laptop), but that isn't easy on a phone.

[ Parent | on HN ]