Re:Why Thomas Cook Collapsed
by pieter_mj on Thursday September 26, 2019 @06:07PM
(#21086098)
what the hell just happened? Way, way faster than anything I've seen in quite a while and loads faster than the 64.ms nonsense.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
That page appears to be about 100K, so I think it would probably have taken at least 15-20 seconds to load on dial-up? Probably back in the day you would have been swearing at how bloated it was.
I worked for a newspaper around the period this article was published (~2000) and we had a strict 120kb limit per page, aiming more for ~90kb, for the exact reasons you suggest.
And we can now measure webpages in Doooms (JFYI):