News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:A patent lawsuit against GNOME by danShumway on Wednesday September 25, 2019 @01:09PM (#21072803)
I would donate to an effort to kill this patent as well.

We have to start getting more aggressive in these scenarios. If the patent isn't killed, they're just going to turn around and sue someone else with it. So if we want a world where small players can compete with the likes of Microsoft or Facebook, we need to retaliate against trolls who go after small players.

Re:A patent lawsuit against GNOME by djsumdog on Wednesday September 25, 2019 @01:19PM (#21072878)
It's not just the patent. That whole company needs to be killed. They serve no useful purpose; the epitome of bullshit jobs.

Honestly I wish more countries would take New Zealand's approach and just outright ban all software patents. There is no reason any software patent should exist.

Re:A patent lawsuit against GNOME by coldpie on Wednesday September 25, 2019 @05:48PM (#21075918)
> That whole company needs to be killed.

And the owners both bankrupted and jailed, or they'll just do it again.

Re:A patent lawsuit against GNOME by tjpnz on Thursday September 26, 2019 @06:16AM (#21079656)
There are still ways you can patent software in New Zealand. I knew a guy who did it and IIRC it was granted on the basis of there being a comparatively small hardware component.
Re:A patent lawsuit against GNOME by danShumway on Wednesday September 25, 2019 @01:31PM (#21073012)
I don't disagree, but I don't think you can bring a legal case to a judge that a company can't exist.

But if every one of their threats resulted in someone dragging them into an expensive fight over whether or not that patent was valid, maybe eventually they'd just go bankrupt from the legal fees.

Essentially, use their own strategy against them. Whenever they sue someone, they have two choices: roll over and let the patent get invalidated, or fight an expensive lawsuit against a party that refuses to settle.

Re:A patent lawsuit against GNOME by freeopinion on Wednesday September 25, 2019 @04:23PM (#21074927)
Where is the satisfaction of having a troll bankrupted by litigation? If the troll went bankrupt, it probably means:

* The lawyers got paid so much money there is no more money left to pay the receptionist and the power company and the copier rental.

* The troll is protected from paying any damages to the legal team that defeated them.

So the lawyers/executives suck up all the money and move on, leaving a wake of destruction behind them. In many cases, that should be considered criminal.