Re:WeWork and Counterfeit Capitalism
by _eht on Wednesday September 25, 2019 @12:27PM
(#21072304)
Taking a jab at clothing generally is so low effort to be actually embarrassing and will invalidate anything else that you are trying to say. IMO.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:WeWork and Counterfeit Capitalism
by coldtea on Wednesday September 25, 2019 @12:28PM
(#21072317)
Taking some comedic/low effort jabs should not invalidate from one's main (and valid) arguments. IMO.
Else it's low effort on the listener's part.
"comedic"
Re:WeWork and Counterfeit Capitalism
by coldtea on Wednesday September 25, 2019 @03:46PM
(#21074543)
Well, "Tragedy is when I cut my finger. Comedy is when you fall into an open sewer and die".
Re:WeWork and Counterfeit Capitalism
by calibas on Wednesday September 25, 2019 @12:52PM
(#21072597)
I'm amazed that the focus is on the author calling a t-shirt "ill-fitting" instead of calling Neumann a liar and a thief.
Apparently, Neumann's fashion sense is more defensible than his personal integrity.
>fashion sense is more defensible than [...] personal integrity.
You take issue with this?
This is just one thread... look at the rest of the discussion.
Re:WeWork and Counterfeit Capitalism
by sremani on Wednesday September 25, 2019 @12:30PM
(#21072339)
What is more embarrassing is picking one statement in huge article and getting hung up on it? As a writer certain things make stylistically sense perhaps only to the author, but that is one substantive article about the state of Capital markets and "Captains" of New Industry.