News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The use of Europe’s “right to be forgotten” privacy law h... by zaroth on Wednesday September 25, 2019 @08:25AM (#21070058)
I love this hypothesis because not only does it fit in perfectly with my world view of Google, but because it’s entirely plausible to consider how their algorithm could inadvertently optimize for such a result simply by looking at click through and bounce rates.

People are likely to click on the most sensational result on the page, and in cases like this they are pretty damn sure going to pick a different search query afterward, which to the algorithm will look like success.

It seems like something easy to study and prove to a high degree of confidence if it is occurring. Particularly the theory that other search engines don’t surface the same negative content, or don’t rank it as highly.

Re:The use of Europe’s “right to be forgotten” privacy law h... by cirno on Wednesday September 25, 2019 @09:47AM (#21070714)
I have done a significant amount of research into this, and compared results through multiple search engines. I am confident this is mostly specific to Google.

I would prefer not to name the sites in question, because they are borderline illegal and I do not wish to give them exposure, but on the off chance any journalists are reading this and are interested, please get in contact with me here and I will share my findings.