Or reported to have been. How much can we trust they were, and that huge corners weren't cut. I don't like to be cynical but all in china seems to be propaganda. For example from https://www.theguardian.com/world/2011/jul/25/chinese-rail-c...
But Hong Kong University's China Media Project said propaganda authorities have ordered media not to send reporters to the scene, not to report too frequently and not to link the story to high-speed rail development. "There must be no seeking after the causes [of the accident], rather, statements from authoritative departments must be followed," said one directive. Another ordered: "No calling into doubt, no development [of further issues], no speculation, and no dissemination [of such things] on personal microblogs!"
The whole story is worse. Difficult not to be cynical.
I've also heard that one of China's largest nuke stations was built dead on a seismic fault which could produce a known acceleration of n, but the station was designed to deal with n/3 acceleration. This is from memory and I can't find the original, so pinch-of-salt mode please.
Also consider continued spending on projects to send men to orbit/Moon/Mars etc, but which never seem to actually get anyone anywhere and are reprogrammed and rescheduled every few years.
Then there is the USS Gerald R. Ford aircraft carrier, first started in 2005, keel laid in 2009, launched in 2013, expected to be deployed in 2020 once all the bugs are worked out of things like the electric elevators. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USS_Gerald_R._Ford
In this political climate, it is unlikely that another reactor will ever be commissioned, operating a plant is an ongoing risk that can be avoided by never even going online.
Might as well keep the paychecks for everyone coming for a while, then sail smoothly into inevitable bankruptcy.
That’s nonsense, the UK is right in the middle of commissioning 5-10 new nuclear reactors, if Areva/EDF could demonstrate an ability to build these plants on budget there’s a huge market opportunity.
I'm not talking about the reactors that already have been or will be commissioned soon. I'm talking about the situation in 10 years when these reactors are supposed to be finished.
Let's see what the situation is like today:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proposed_nuclear_power_station...
Hinkley B - under construction, way over budget already
Oldbury and Wylfa Newydd - shelved
Moorside - failed
Bradwell B - Chinese venture
That leaves Sizewell C, to be completed in 2031.
That's just a not a good trend for western companies.
> ...if Areva/EDF could demonstrate an ability to build these plants on budget there’s a huge market opportunity.
If private companies need to be dragged in with tons of incentives just to get involved, that doesn't sound like a great opportunity at all.
The worst thing that happened to this project was that it went to production. Had it not come to pass everything would be fine.
Fortunately the Chinese ones in Taishan were delivered quite on time & budget this year.
It's sad to see all these issues with execution, doing a bad press for nuclear - while we really need more of it to decarbonize our electricity (at least in the mid-term).