Re:Tape still beats SSDs and hard drives when it comes to pr...
by time0ut on Wednesday September 25, 2019 @06:45AM
(#21069429)
Ya, this is an odd article. It seems aimed at the consumer. Maybe it's a lack of imagination on my part, but I can't think of a consumer use case that calls for tape. I think the article could have benefited from spelling one out.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Tape still beats SSDs and hard drives when it comes to pr...
by archi42 on Wednesday September 25, 2019 @07:56AM
(#21069850)
I was considering to mirror my cold storage backup (12 bay NAS with a few hours uptime per week) to tape for long term archival of private data (e.g. photos) or stuff on the internet I think is worth having a backup of (e.g. the http://unrealarchive.org).
But the tape storage requirements and danger of running into trouble with the reader (especially considering I could get a misaligned one when buying used, and if that one breaks => tough luck) convinced me this isn't a good choice. [edit] For the same money I can just get a bunch of additional disks, and use two for simple, redundant, offsite backups; and the remainders to swap out old disks in the NAS pre-fail.
Re:Tape still beats SSDs and hard drives when it comes to pr...
by klodolph on Wednesday September 25, 2019 @09:22AM
(#21070492)
For what it's worth, the tape drive head has to align to the servo tracks on the tape. Both on read and write.
Re:Tape still beats SSDs and hard drives when it comes to pr...
by Porthos9K on Wednesday September 25, 2019 @09:31AM
(#21070572)
Do manufacturers even offer consumer-grade tape backup solutions nowadays? Do tape drives even use USB, or is the tech still using SCSI? I can't seem to get a straight answer from Google, but I doubt it.