Re:Bike crash left Spokane man unconscious, so his Apple Wat...
by dantle on Tuesday September 24, 2019 @08:36PM
(#21066364)
Why would a different accelerometer surprise you? The entire SiP is different between the Series 3 and Series 4. One source say the accelerometer in S4 has higher dynamic range. [0]
[0] https://www.anandtech.com/show/13364/apple-announces-the-app...
Re:Bike crash left Spokane man unconscious, so his Apple Wat...
by graeme on Tuesday September 24, 2019 @08:50PM
(#21066437)
They specifically said in the announcement that it was due to new tech.
Re:Bike crash left Spokane man unconscious, so his Apple Wat...
by alphakappa on Tuesday September 24, 2019 @11:22PM
(#21067298)
Consider that to detect falls reliably, you might need an accelerometer with a higher range than that was in the original watch.
Re:Bike crash left Spokane man unconscious, so his Apple Wat...
by JaRail on Wednesday September 25, 2019 @12:30PM
(#21072346)
Might also have needed a higher sample rate.
For battery life concerns, I can see them implementing some of the fall detection logic in hardware as well. For example, a high shock or shaking could trigger the fall-detection software to wake. Although, with the 60-second period, they probably wake the main processor often enough anyway that hardware detection might not save much power.
(I would be very surprised if the series 3 and 4 have significantly different accelerometer hardware)