News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Comparing Database Types. Parent comment

Re:Comparing Database Types by mrjn on Tuesday September 24, 2019 @05:00PM (#21064562)
(Dgraph author) Particularly embarrassing because I actually know the founders of Prisma ;-). Amazing folks!

They even included YugaByte, with only 2.8K GitHub stars. Dgraph crossed 11K GitHub stars and is in the top 10 Graph DBs on DB Engine now -- what would it take for us to be in the article, Søren?

Just joking. Nice article! Keep up the good work, guys!

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Comparing Database Types by imchairmanm on Tuesday September 24, 2019 @05:05PM (#21064620)
Hey there, I'm responsible for this omission! I've gotten quite a few comments internally and externally so I'll make sure to give Dgraph a mention when I incorporate some of the feedback I've received from this thread. Thanks for the heads up!
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Comparing Database Types by ifcologne on Wednesday September 25, 2019 @03:44AM (#21068665)
What I miss in the conclusion: Multi-model databases

More and more products support multiple data models today.

This reduces the number of technologies in your tech stack and allows to combine different access patterns without the need to duplicate and sync data between systems.

[ Parent | on HN ]