News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on The 64 Milliseconds Manifesto.

Re:The 64 Milliseconds Manifesto by wbhart on Tuesday September 24, 2019 @03:01PM (#21063469)
They missed the remaining portion of the manifesto:

* Websites making controversial claims should state clearly the claim in the first paragraph

* Controversial claims should be backed up by at least a summary of a well reasoned argument within the first 5 paragraphs.

* Controversial claims should be backed up by citing sources.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:The 64 Milliseconds Manifesto by loup-vaillant on Tuesday September 24, 2019 @04:58PM (#21064552)
Controversial? Really? What's written there is basically what's required for interactive speed. What's described here is basically what's required for interaction to feel instantaneous. Why should we settle for anything but immediacy?

Sure, with all those laggy applications we have right now, we tend to become desensitised. That's not an excuse, though.

Also note that in some cases, we're not even close to acceptable latency. Finger tracking on touch screens for instance, require a one millisecond response time to feel perfect. Otherwise the objects we drag will lag behind our fingers.

[ Parent | on HN ]