I can’t imagine someone messing up Stackoverflow, but Digg managed to do it so there’s always a way (although SO doesn’t have a high quality direct competitor like Reddit...yet.). The best time to take on a business is when they’ve peaked and get distracted, they forget about being the best in the market. I should note I don’t think SO is near that point yet.
Prashanth is a grave robber trying to find a few valuables to snatch for investors.
But SO is still pretty damn useful, like Wikipedia.
I'm genuinely curious, I'm not familiar with SO besides having answered a few top questions and getting some points long ago.
Except SO for businesses could probably work quite well. I work for BIGTECHCO and the natural language query interface into institutional knowledge is very ad-hoc, being distributed amongst Slack histories, internal mailing list archives, etc. It would definitely be improved if consolidated with a decent UI.
Agree with the general point, but the guy burned 8 million dollars in investor money to get to the point where the business is "just fine". It's not really a good example IMO.
https://marker.medium.com/reflecting-on-my-failure-to-build-...
Also here is where the project started on Show HN:
Also here is where the project started on Show HN:
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=2406614
Really to cool to see a Show HN and know the story years later.
- Find thing that gets traction and growth.
- Demand more growth than the thing you do well is providing.
- Focus not on the thing you do well....
Seems to happen time and again. I always think of the story on HN about the guy who bought back his startup from the VCs for $1 after it "failed" and he went and ran it without the same expectations, and it is doing just fine.
There are maybe just some good ideas out there that aren't meant to be unicorns, but are productive none the less but they get buried in other expectations.