Re:600k Images Removed from ImageNet After Art Project Expos...
by Erlich_Bachman on Tuesday September 24, 2019 @02:24AM
(#21057109)
You have such poor use of sources to underline your claims it is almost incredible.
What underlines it is seemingly a lack of understanding of statistics, becausee the most "examples", if they can even be called that are from the realm of non-common outlier cases. That's not what statistics operates on mostly - it operates on common cases that cover the largest part of a distribution. Not outlier cases on the ends of a distribution.
In every case you gave an example of some uncommon exception, as if that would somehow be an argument for the rule existing?
What underlines it is seemingly a lack of understanding of statistics, becausee the most "examples", if they can even be called that are from the realm of non-common outlier cases. That's not what statistics operates on mostly - it operates on common cases that cover the largest part of a distribution. Not outlier cases on the ends of a distribution.
In every case you gave an example of some uncommon exception, as if that would somehow be an argument for the rule existing?