Re:600k Images Removed from ImageNet After Art Project Expos...
by jacquesm on Tuesday September 24, 2019 @12:55AM
(#21056697)
> John Doe is not going to be pursued aggressively to fill the Senior Marketing Manager role.
That's exactly what recruiters and headhunters do. Aggressively nails it.
Re:600k Images Removed from ImageNet After Art Project Expos...
by rumanator on Tuesday September 24, 2019 @02:00AM
(#21056978)
Recruiters and headhunters don't necessarily seek people to fill a role. They seek people to fill their batch of application forms to send to those actually doing the hiring.
Re:600k Images Removed from ImageNet After Art Project Expos...
by smt88 on Tuesday September 24, 2019 @08:25AM
(#21059287)
Recruiters don't replace the interview process, where the dynamic is that the applicant is the interviewee. They only change the way the applicant discovers the job.
Most people will never be headhunted.
Re:600k Images Removed from ImageNet After Art Project Expos...
by al_chemist on Tuesday September 24, 2019 @09:41PM
(#21066731)
If candidate had more power, companies would create whole section of company to try to find and hire talents. Companies would literally pay to find candidates.
Re:600k Images Removed from ImageNet After Art Project Expos...
by lone_haxx0r on Tuesday September 24, 2019 @04:46PM
(#21064449)
By that same logic, it's unfair for attractive people to choose who they date, because they're in a position of power.
Of course, that scenario happens only in extreme edge cases. Even in a booming economy with a shortage of workers, John Doe is not going to be pursued aggressively to fill the Senior Marketing Manager role.
This makes intuitive sense: employers have a ton of money, so people come to them.
Right now I have a client who needs to hire truck drivers and can't do it fast enough. I asked him what he'd done to make his company the most attractive (pay, technology, perks, etc.). He said he's done nothing.