Is the era of the $100 graphing calculator coming to an end?

Re:Is the era of the $100 graphing calculator coming to an end? by fulldecent2 on Monday September 23, 2019 @11:26PM (#21056200)

I have previously been on site for an SAT II reading session (this is the part following the proctoring). It was hard enough to get the logistics right for getting all the scantron sheets and papers to where they needed to go. And overnight shipping printers and other equipment on failure.

Adding any more logistics into this process would increase costs and provide no headline-worthy benefit.

* The teachers, not the students, use scantrons

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Is the era of the $100 graphing calculator coming to an end? by ineedasername on Wednesday September 25, 2019 @10:08AM (#21070898)

Yes, the logistics would need to be worked out. However I've proctored large LSAT tests and not found the workload of reading instructions and gathering papers to be so burdensome that I wouldn't have been able to deal with calculators. This isn't rocket science, portraying it as insurmountably difficult or expensive really over estimates the problem: A nominal increase to the test fee would easily cover additional costs.

Either way, the headline-worthy benefit, if I take your meaning with that phrase correctly, is that this is a standardized test. You don't get to "standardized" by not providing equal equipment to test takers. Regardless of whether it's "easy" to do, it is a necessary condition for actually being a standardized test.

[ Parent | on HN ]