If I sold a competing product, I'd beat them to death with this.

Where does it end? Maybe next year Chef decides they don't like DEA. Or ATF. Or something else.

It is not noble to deny work with the US Government. It's inefficient, bureaucratic, and deeply flawed. But it does a powerful lot of good.

This isn't a bad thing. It's an action that will cause retooling and any of the associated costs to happen when they otherwise wouldn't.

Let them pick the contract up. Hopefully they charge more, take longer to implement, and are generally worse.

Not only does this have little impact to ICE, the taxpayer gets soaked. Expensive outrage porn.

The more expensive it is to operate ICE, the harder it is to justify its continued operation.

The project is worth ~$100k-$200k. It’s a rounding error in their budget (ICE annual budget is about $8 billion a year for FY2018; for context, US DHS is ~$92 billion/yr)

No one is ever going to deprecate ICE because it’s too expensive. They’ll just pull the money from someplace like NASA (unfortunate reality, not a policy I endorse).

So it's a rounding error for DHS but an expensive soaking for the taxpayer? That doesn't bear out.

No one is going to deprecate ICE because it's too expensive, but they might do it due to extensive political pressure from all sectors. I'm okay with paying 0.001 USD or so to send that message.

Do you think there could be a reasonable way to fix that issue?

Maybe a compromise between voters picking where their taxes go and a minimum for what tax payers have to pay for a certain area?

It might not even cause retooling. They can hire someone else to run Chef for them.