Re:Serverless: slower and more expensive
by fogetti on Monday September 23, 2019 @10:58AM
(#21049493)
I haven't thought about step 3 before, but makes sense. Maybe I should show this to the guy who used Google Cloud Functions to upload images in our previous project :)
I guess the reasoning would be that this way the actual time spent in serverless code is shorter and by proxy the service becomes cheaper?
Re:Serverless: slower and more expensive
by abiro on Monday September 23, 2019 @11:33AM
(#21049862)
Saves time and money by writing and executing less code + S3 is optimized for this task, so it will always perform better than an ad hoc serverless function.
I guess the reasoning would be that this way the actual time spent in serverless code is shorter and by proxy the service becomes cheaper?