News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:On the Leaked Google/NASA Quantum Supremacy Paper by reikonomusha on Monday September 23, 2019 @10:32AM (#21049241)
I don’t think it’s a mistaken claim so much as a misused term-of-art by conflating it with its layman meaning. If you replace “interference” with “noise”, what’s being said makes sense.

However, the second bit you said is true, even after correcting the term.

Re:On the Leaked Google/NASA Quantum Supremacy Paper by jebej on Monday September 23, 2019 @10:37AM (#21049286)
They seem to know about decoherence, and in a later post associate interference with probabilities, so I don't think that was the issue. Maybe a typo?