Serverless: slower and more expensive

Re:Serverless: slower and more expensive by dave_sid on Monday September 23, 2019 @08:26AM (#21048229)

While in most cases I would agree, in this case I have to disagree. I think serverless has been a good idea implemented badly in every instance.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Serverless: slower and more expensive by lurker458 on Monday September 23, 2019 @01:43PM (#21051353)

If (nearly) every implementation of a good idea turns out badly, is it still a good idea ? It smells like the No True Scotsman fallacy.

[ Parent | on HN ]

[dead]

Re:Serverless: slower and more expensive by pm90 on Monday September 23, 2019 @10:02AM (#21049014)

Socialism is an ideology though. It might sound similar but that’s it.

Every technology has a break in period where good ideas are badly implemented. It’s after you pass that initial stage and understand both the tech and how to implement and use it efficiently do you start to see the real gains of it.

[ Parent | on HN ]

[dead]

Re:Serverless: slower and more expensive by protonfish on Monday September 23, 2019 @09:00AM (#21048473)

How about using a server?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Serverless: slower and more expensive by ianwalter on Monday September 23, 2019 @10:34AM (#21049256)

Serverful?

[ Parent | on HN ]