News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:W3Fools - A W3Schools Intervention by Roridge on Friday January 14, 2011 @12:58PM (#2104567)
Would it be wrong to point out that the missing parts of the source for w3fools.com ? Or observing that placement of things like the google analytics code at the bottom, instead of the head?

Or would that make me pedantic?

Re:W3Fools - A W3Schools Intervention by peol on Friday January 14, 2011 @01:07PM (#2104627)
Regarding the placement of GA, this is intentional. You don't want to count a visit before the page has actually been displayed to the user.
Re:W3Fools - A W3Schools Intervention by bentruyman on Friday January 14, 2011 @02:01PM (#2104927)
Re:W3Fools - A W3Schools Intervention by Roridge on Monday January 17, 2011 @08:15AM (#2112038)
Actually the modern GA way is using the async javascript the snippit for which goes before the </head> but hey W3Fools wasn't about being accurate... oh wait, it was.

http://code.google.com/intl/en-GB/apis/analytics/docs/tracki...