Re:What is a functional programming language?
by loewenskind on Friday January 14, 2011 @03:06AM
(#2102908)
That doesn't follow. If we define "OOP" to encompasses everything that anyone calls OOP then it's very possible for there to be "good parts" and "bad parts" in that set.
P.S. Smalltalk is a beautiful language with a great deal to offer anyone, but multimethods are superior. The fact that multimethods don't require multiple dispatch patterns demonstrates this.
P.S. Smalltalk is a beautiful language with a great deal to offer anyone, but multimethods are superior. The fact that multimethods don't require multiple dispatch patterns demonstrates this.